Steven W. Lee <br /> Page 2 <br /> The fee schedule was amended in March of 2000, so that under either option, the <br /> bond (or cash deposit) or the fee paid directly to the City was based upon the same <br /> formula. This was calculated as follows' <br /> a. Measure the total length of Tots within or abutting the street right of way <br /> in the area being developed; <br /> b. Subtract 15 feet for each leg of the vision clearance zone of each <br /> intersection included within me development; <br /> c. Subtract 30 feet for each residential lot or 80 feet for each commercial or <br /> industrial lot within the development (representing future driveways); <br /> d. Divide by 30. <br /> e. Multiply by 1.10 (representing the 10% anticipated tree mortality); <br /> 1. Multiply by $300 for local streets or $400 for collector or arterial streets <br /> The fee schedule, as amended, after reciting the above formula, then specifically <br /> states: <br /> 'The fee is equal to the cost of purchase, installation, and <br /> establishment of the street trees required by the approved Street Tree Plan." <br /> While the formula and fee schedule appears, on its face, to be an equitable method <br /> of calculating the costs to the City, the actual implementation of the fee schedule and <br /> Street Tree Plan has proven otherwise. A review of the fees paid to the City pursuant to <br /> the Street Tree Plan Agreements executed for each of your subdivisions, when compared <br /> to the number of street trees demonstrates large differences in the amount pad for each tree. (S (See subdivision, <br /> Exhibit A� <br /> It is clear that the fees paid, based upon the calculations taken from the fee <br /> schedule, do not reflect the actual costs of the City, but are, in fact, arbitrary, and in my <br /> opinion, violate Street Tree Program Administrative Rule R- 7,260 -F(1). <br /> There are two basic reasons why the fee schedule does not truly reflect the costs <br /> to the City' <br /> 1. The formula does consider the fact that street trees cannot be planted in <br /> vision clearance zones or driveways. However, R- 7.2800(6) creates a <br /> multitude of other standards which further restrict the planting of street trees <br /> in certain locations. These include, but are not limited to, fire hydrants, <br /> buried utility lines, overhead utility lines, meters, and street signs. As a result <br /> of this, the actual number of trees planted by the City at least varies from <br /> subdivision to subdivision, and is almost always significantly less than <br /> anticipated. Logically, this has to decrease the costs to the City, meaning <br /> that the fees paid by the developer exceed the actual costs, in direct violation <br /> of Administrative Rule R- 7.280- F)(1). <br />