New Search
My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
New Search
Service Profile, UF
COE
>
PW
>
POS_PWM
>
Parks
>
Street Trees.Urban Forestry
>
Service Profile, UF
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/17/2014 1:53:53 PM
Creation date
10/17/2014 1:53:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PW_Operating
PW_Document_Type_ Operating
Correspondence
PW_Division
Parks and Open Space
Identification_Number
Medlin folder
External_View
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
196
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
CITIZEN REVIEW OF URBAN FORESTRY SERVICE PROFILE <br /> The Neighborhood Leaders Group reviewed the service profile for Urban Forestry. Although <br /> this group has no official oversight responsibility for the Urban Forestry program, it was felt that <br /> their input might be valuable because of the neighborhoods' involvement in the "Neighbor <br /> Woods" program that Urban Forestry promotes. <br /> A copy of the service profile and a survey were distributed to the Neighborhood Leaders Group <br /> before their meeting on November 26. At that meeting, the group spent about 25 minutes <br /> discussing the profile results. <br /> Feedback on Policy Areas: <br /> Mission: <br /> Question to the group: Do you agree the mission statement captures the essence of why this service system <br /> exists? <br /> Responses: Yes _7_ No Maybe <br /> Summary of Comments: The word "enhance" was unclear to four of the respondents. Many <br /> respondents wanted the mission to reflect some type of expansion or improvement of the City's <br /> urban forest. One respondent suggested accomplishing this expansion idea by enlisting citizens <br /> as partners in maintenance, e.g., with an "adopt -a- tree" program. <br /> Action Taken: The service team replaced the word "enhance" with "improve" in the mission <br /> statement. <br /> Outcomes: <br /> Question to the group: Do you agree the outcomes reflect the longer range desired results to which this <br /> service's outputs contribute? <br /> Responses: Yes _6_ No Maybe _1 . <br /> Summary of Comments: One respondent liked the education and preservation outcomes. <br /> Another respondent stated "there should be an outcome that focused on serving the citizens of <br /> Eugene." There was some uncertainty regarding the words "canopy cover." While one person <br /> suggested that increased canopy cover would be nice to have, emphasis should be placed <br /> on preservation of existing assets until consistent funding or a volunteer base is established. <br /> Action Taken: None. The Service team felt that the mission and operating principles <br /> sufficiently described how the service focusses on serving the citizens. <br /> 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.