New Search
My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
New Search
Amazon Park, 1994
COE
>
PW
>
POS_PWM
>
Parks
>
Specific Parks
>
Amazon Park, 1994
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/27/2014 2:05:19 PM
Creation date
8/27/2014 2:02:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PW_Operating
PW_Document_Type_ Operating
Correspondence
PW_Division
Parks and Open Space
External_View
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
74
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
From: Lyle, Les <br /> To: Hammitt, Bob; Medlin, Johnny <br /> Subject: FW: Amazon Park Planning Meeting <br /> Date: Thursday, March 31, 1994 9:05AM <br /> Some observations from Tim B. regarding the planning meeting. <br /> Hope you find it useful. Thanks Les L <br /> From: Evans, Deborah <br /> To: Lyle, Les <br /> Subject: FW: Amazon Park Planning Meeting <br /> Date: Thursday, March 31, 1994 8:46AM <br /> Les - FYI from Tim Deborah <br /> From: Bingham, Tim <br /> To: Evans, Deborah <br /> Cc: Gordon, Steve <br /> Subject: Amazon Park Planning Meeting <br /> Date: Wednesday, March 30, 1994 4:27PM <br /> There were about 50 persons attending, including Councilor <br /> Barbara Keller. Other notable folks <br /> included Art Farley, Bruce Newhouse, Al Johnson, and <br /> representatives from the Master Running <br /> Club, KidSports, and the Off -Leash Organization. Staff <br /> included John E, John Webber, Bob Hammitt, Nathan Duke, and <br /> Louis Kroeck. <br /> My part went fine. One of the folks representing the running <br /> club that wants to install lighting around <br /> the jogging trail suggested that water quality related <br /> projects could hold up their project. I indicated <br /> there were no immediate water quality project for the park <br /> that would interfer with their project. The <br /> overall interest would be to work with the Parks Division to <br /> coordinate water quality opportunities <br /> with other planning efforts and construction projects. That <br /> seemed to satisfy his concern. <br /> Personal Observation - the planning process for this project <br /> is very awkward. The purpose of the <br /> project is unclear and, as a result, the process is confusing. <br /> The purpose appears to be to gather <br /> input from special interest groups who want to use the park <br /> for their needs, and then develop a public response via a <br /> construction plan. With the wide range of interests expressed <br /> at the meeting, from natural <br /> resource protection and enhancement to intensive recreation <br /> ball fields lighted w/ ample parking, to <br /> LTD interests to flood control and water quality <br /> possibilities, to implications with TransPlan update, to <br /> futrue street improvements, a broader planning process should <br /> be considered that gives the public an opportunity to <br /> participate w/n a structured format where the decision making <br /> function is with an independent body, such as the Planning <br /> Commission, Hearings Officer, or City Council. This could <br /> result in a master plan for the park where the public is aware <br /> of and expects changes and new uses over time. This may be <br /> even more important given the possibilities of future planning <br /> efforts for the area - <br /> Update of South Hills Refinement Plan and Basin Plan. <br /> Page 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.