New Search
My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
New Search
Amazon Park 2003-2004 Development Plan
COE
>
PW
>
POS_PWM
>
Parks
>
Specific Parks
>
Amazon Park 2003-2004 Development Plan
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/21/2014 12:22:11 PM
Creation date
8/21/2014 12:18:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PW_Operating
PW_Document_Type_ Operating
Correspondence
PW_Division
Parks and Open Space
External_View
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
56
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
In regards to the current need for more ball fields, all of your statistics are city generated rather from the <br />community as a whole. In the most recent community survey, which is the only statistically valid report to reflect <br />the desires and concerns of the community, playing soccer or baseball is not listed in the top 20 recreation <br />activities people would like to do more often (Community Survey, p.20)! In addition, team managers have been <br />99% satisfied to very satisfied until fees have been raised when their satisfaction was reduced to 90 % - -a rate that <br />is still very high. You use the number 24,000 participants, whereas in the City Budget FY 04 the number used is <br />16,000. Even the focus group of sports advocates state the declining popularity of baseball and softball. The city <br />has exceeded the bond goals of updating fields by four (19 instead of 15), so I see no need for the continuation of <br />updating when other priorities still exist (pools, path connectivity, light shields, landscaping, etc.). I have to <br />question why it is that your numbers and representation are so biased toward sports field development. <br />We must be honest and begin to really listen and respond with action and resources to the overall community's <br />desire of what they want their parks to look like —more natural, trails, habitat protection, youth programming, and <br />pools (see Eugene Outdoors, p 7). Creating more ball fields, of any kind, especially in a wetland, requires a <br />ridiculous amount of drainage, money, and chemical treatment in a park that is clearly more than 50% developed <br />and that has a natural element that needs protection. Creating a more natural park would dove -tail with the huge <br />efforts of the city, EWEB, County, State and Federal agencies expenditure to keep our streams clean. Amazon has <br />a unique water feature, which no other park in Eugene has and needs coordinated not conflicting developments <br />comprehensively planned. <br />It has been incredibly frustrating working with the city staff who seem to have a switch and bait approach to our <br />questions and concerns. It took from March until the end of September to end the illegal pool parking on the <br />grassland. And now to protect Amazon park, I must spend my time pointing to city documents that already guide <br />the city staff on what is the right thing to do. Building more ball fields is counterproductive to the project of <br />naturalizing the stream that the city hopes to do with the aid of other entities. I would like to see a <br />comprehensive plan that includes the coordinated effort with the Corp of Engineers before we implement <br />any more sports field updates. Since a good amount of bond money is still left, a pool or other youth recreation <br />should be explored in order to meet the priorities and desires of the community. <br />I do hope to stay involved in the process and request that all public process and mayor's committee meeting dates <br />and locations be listed in a timely fashion on the website that encourages citizen involvement —i.e. providing a <br />month notice for meetings, giving dates for subsequent meetings at the current meeting, and updating minutes <br />regularly. Please include my name on any interested parties list for public process or park governance meetings. <br />What I am bringing to your attention is not a minority opinion about a single park issue but a majority opinion <br />about our entire park system. I hope that all future correspondence from the city will be more fair and accurate. <br />cerely, <br />Marcy Cauthorn <br />Citizens for a Natural Amazon <br />2739 University Street <br />Eugene OR 97403 <br />cc. Carolyn Weiss, Project Manager <br />Kurt Corey, PW Director <br />Renee Grube, Recreation Division Manager <br />Dennis Taylor, City Manager <br />Mayors Advisory Committee <br />Floyd Prozanski, State Representative <br />Lauri Segal, 1000 Friends of Oregon <br />Jeff Krueger, LCOG <br />Johnny Medlin, POS Division Manager <br />Angel Jones, LRCS Director <br />Scott Duckett, Natural Resources Manager <br />Mayor Torrey and Eugene City Councilors <br />Planning Committee <br />Peter DeFazio, State Representative <br />Jan Spencer, Citizens for Public Accountability <br />Randy Webb, Institute for Wildlife Protection <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.