Johnny Medlin <br /> July 21, 1995 <br /> Page 2 <br /> of -way and referred to as Area B in the 1995 Proposal. The City also agreed to abide by the <br /> user group parking restrictions of the County- University agreement's paragraph 11. <br /> The third agreement was executed between County, City, Willamalane Park & Recreation <br /> District and the City of Springfield in February 1993 (County - City 1993). In this agreement <br /> the County agreed to convey to City the Central Section of East Alton Baker Park. (Paragraph <br /> 1). Exhibit A reveals that the parcel conveyed to the City includes the land south of the Leo <br /> Harris Parkway, east of the BMX area and west of Walnut Road (See Master Plan Exhibit A). <br /> The County parcel to be conveyed to the City therefore includes the 1995 Proposal's Area E. <br /> Assignment of Rights to City <br /> The County-City 1993 agreement specifically addresses the then- existing contractual <br /> relations with the University concerning parking along the north side of East Alton Baker Park. <br /> (Paragraph 9). In the County -City 1993 agreement, the County assigned and transferred all the <br /> rights, duties and responsibilities of the County under the County- University agreement to the <br /> City; the City accepted the assignment. (Paragraph 9). <br /> The general rule of contract construction in Oregon is that contract rights and duties are <br /> freely transferable. Folquet v. Woodburn Schools, 146 Or 339, 341, 29 P.2d 554 (1934). <br /> Contracts are assignable unless the contract is in the nature of personal services, contains a <br /> stipulation against assignment or the assignment is forbidden by statute or public policy. Id.; <br /> Weathers v. M.C. Lininger & Sons, 68 Or App 30, 682 P.2d 770, rev. denied, 297 Or 492 <br /> (1984). <br /> The County - University agreement does not forbid assignment, in fact it does not address <br /> assignment at all. Furthermore, there could be no collateral agreements against assignment <br /> under the Merger Clause (Paragraph 22), which limits the agreement to the written provisions <br /> of the contract itself, unless County and University signed a written modification. There is no <br /> subsequent written modification between the County and University. The agreement is not a <br /> personal services contract, nor is assignment of this contract against statute or public policy. <br /> Therefore, the County was free to assign it's rights and delegate it's duties under the contract <br /> to the City. <br /> University's 1995 Proposal <br /> Some of the proffered agreements of the 1995 Proposal are duplicative of the existing <br /> contract provisions and confuse the existing obligations between the University and the City. <br /> The 1995 Proposal presents three City obligations. <br /> Under the first obligation the City shall allow University exclusive use of Area A for <br /> parking up to a maximum of 12 times a year for major events at the stadium. In the County - <br /> University agreement, the County promised to "allow the University full use and control of <br />