New Search
My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
New Search
Friendly Park, 2007
COE
>
PW
>
POS_PWM
>
Parks
>
Specific Parks
>
Friendly Park, 2007
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/19/2014 4:23:15 PM
Creation date
8/19/2014 4:23:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PW_Operating
PW_Document_Type_ Operating
Correspondence
PW_Division
Parks and Open Space
Identification_Number
Friendly Park
External_View
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Page 5 of 10 <br /> >>> <br /> > > > Dear Nancy Ellen, <br /> >>> <br /> > > > Thanks for your kind reply. <br /> >>> <br /> > > > I'm afraid I will be traveling on October 8th and won't be able <br /> > > > to attend the FAN meeting. Do you know when the next one will <br /> > > > be scheduled? <br /> >>> <br /> > > > Concerning the equipment, I wouldn't worry too much about <br /> > > > the color as far as heat absorption goes. The area for the adult <br /> > > > equipment is well shaded. Speaking as a physicist, I doubt there <br /> > > > is much difference between black and the deep colors that I <br /> > > > hope are avoided. <br /> >>> <br /> > > > Best Regards, <br /> > > > David <br /> >>> <br /> >>> <br /> > > > On Sep 27, 2007, at 8:01 AM, Nancy Ellen Locke wrote: <br /> >>> <br /> > > > > Dear David, et al... <br /> >> >> <br /> > > > > 1.) Concretely put, would FAN pass a resolution supporting the <br /> > > > > designation of the Red Oaks in Friendly park as heritage trees. <br /> > > > > * ** I can not speak for the entire FAN Executive Board, but I <br /> > > > > have put this on the agenda for Monday, October 8th. Why don't <br /> > > > > you come to the meeting and even consider joining the Board? I <br /> > > > > know that you have shown a lot of interest in the neighborhood - <br /> > > > > and not just this park issue. <br /> >> >> <br /> > > > > 2.) > I'm afraid that the number of camas bulbs we could easily <br /> >> » dig is <br /> > > > > > insignificant compared to the <br /> > > > > > number you require. 600 sounds like a lot -- are there that <br /> > > many in <br /> > > > > > the city's native nursery? Our <br /> > > > > > experience is that not many are needed to get things going, <br /> > > but of <br /> > > > > > course this takes some time. <br /> > > > > * ** I have camas in my yard too - 4 different types. Yes, they do <br /> > > > > multiply - but rather slowly. We will be getting our bulbs from <br /> >> » Balance <br /> > > > > Nursery - per our grant/contract. <br /> > »> <br /> >> >> <br /> > > > > 3.) > Do you have a planting plan? <br /> > > > > * ** Yes, you can reference it on the "concept map" that was handed <br /> > > > > out when I went door -to -door last winter. Camas bulbs on the east <br /> > > > > side of the park - behind your property mostly. And the native <br /> > > plant <br /> > > > > entrance garden on the map. We will be planting native plants from <br /> > > > > Doak's Native Plant Nursery there. The entrance garden will be <br /> > > > > professionally designed. Both of these plantings were agreed on at <br /> >> »the <br /> > > > > concept meetings and they are in the grant /contract as such. <br /> 10/5/2007 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.