New Search
e <br /> MEDLIN Johnny R <br /> From: BERRIAN Pam C <br /> To: MEDLIN Johnny R; LYLE Les A <br /> Subject: RE: read this one -Land exchange -- consent calendar item <br /> Date: Tuesday, November 05, 1996 10:39AM <br /> ignore my other note..TC just gave me LN's suggestions re: officers..she said this should just be placed on <br /> the next cvonsent calendar (11/25)... "unless this is unusual "? Will defer to you two to let me know if it <br /> is...P (Les- -some councilors seem to not want to consider anything they haven't already heard <br /> about....maybe a memo first, then the item on Consent? Sending it to officers makes it a little cleaner but <br /> maybe its overkill ?) <br /> From: LYLE Les A <br /> To: MEDLIN Johnny R <br /> Cc: BERRIAN Pam C <br /> Subject: RE: Land exchange -- consent calendar item <br /> Date: Tuesday, November 05, 1996 10:12AM <br /> I think the only other issue is Council officers. I think Pam <br /> has it on her list of pending items just to make sure they are <br /> ok with it being consent and to have an understanding what is <br /> coming. Pam, have we confirmed as yet the items on the list <br /> with Linda? Johnny, you may need to represent the item to <br /> officers on the 12th if it gets on the agenda. Thanks Les L <br /> From: MEDLIN Johnny R <br /> To: ETTER John F; LYLE Les A; ROYER Russ C <br /> Cc: FERGUSON Joe M <br /> Subject: RE: Land exchange -- consent calendar item <br /> Date: Tuesday, November 05, 1996 9:51 AM <br /> I agree these answers ( and Joe's) should give sufficient <br /> material for the packet. At this point with John going on <br /> vacation I'm not sure when we will have a draft, but will try <br /> to get one out as soon as we can. I question whether or not <br /> he can get that finished today. Since we are targeting a <br /> November 25th meeting that will give John a small amount of <br /> time once he returns on the 18th. <br /> Thanks <br /> Johnny <br /> From: ROYER Russ C <br /> To: ETTER John F; MEDLIN Johnny R; LYLE Les A <br /> Cc: FERGUSON Joe M <br /> Subject: RE: Land exchange -- consent calendar item <br /> Date: Tuesday, November 05, 1996 9:09AM <br /> Les, all this from a one para memo - I'll be sure to remember <br /> not to send any 2 or 3 para memo's your way. But, thanks for <br /> the input. Johnny, the following are a few thoughts, <br /> regarding Les' questions, you might be able to use in <br /> preparing your briefing statement: <br /> 1. Since we are using the sale method described in code <br /> section 2.872 'real property disposal - all other property', <br /> we are not using the 'surplus property sale' method as <br /> described in 2.864, therefore it is my understanding we do not <br /> need to go through the declaration of surplus property. I <br /> think it was determined this is not surplus and would (could ?) <br /> not be sold, unless it is replaced with an equal or greater <br /> Page 1 <br />