New Search
• <br /> Memo on Ridgline Park and Land Use Compliance <br /> July 10, 2001 <br /> Page 7 of 7 <br /> meantime - say, for example, that a trail segment was initiated at a time when the park <br /> use was allowed outright, but a discretionary review would now be required. Alteration <br /> of nonconforming segments of the Ridgeline Trail would be subject to the statutory <br /> standards for alterations to a nonconforming use. See ORS 215.130. <br /> (3) Parts of the trail that were put into uses without compliance with all the laws in effect at <br /> the time would be illegal uses now. <br /> For new Ridgeline Park uses in rural Lane County: <br /> (1) The new uses would be subject to Lane County land use jurisdiction. <br /> (2) The new uses would require discretionary review by Lane County, and would require <br /> consistency with statutes, rules, and county code provisions. <br /> (3) It may be that the new Parks Planning Rule has boosted the planning standards for the <br /> Ridgeline Trail, and, in order to avoid the need for an exception to Goal 3 or Goal 4, the <br /> Ridgeline Trail Park may need to be the subject of a comprehensive county park plan that <br /> meets the planning requirements of the new rule. <br /> parks Planb <br />