_ <br /> SITE VALUATION <br /> In this section, the market value of the subject site will be estimated by comparing it <br /> with recent sales of land located in the subject's market area. As discussed in the Site <br /> Description section, the subject contains nearly 1200 acres of land area. The land is <br /> bisected by a ridgeline and the MetroPlan line. The highest and best use for the <br /> northern portion of the subject is to hold for future development while the highest and <br /> best use of the southern portion is for forest related uses as well as utilizing the dwelling <br /> permits for two of the subject tax lots. <br /> The limited number of comparable sales in the subject's immediate area and lack of <br /> uniformity within this market prevents direct extraction of adjustments from the <br /> marketplace. General analysis reflecting market behavior is utilized to determine which <br /> comparables are superior or inferior to the subject. This analysis establishes value <br /> parameters for the subject, allowing for a final conclusion of value. The subject <br /> property is very large in comparison to the sales used in this analysis. A thorough search <br /> • revealed very few sales as large ds the subject property. Therefore, the' sales have <br /> been adjusted for their size. <br /> The price per acre unit of comparison will be used in this analysis. This indicator best <br /> reflects the behavior of the typical buyer and seller in the subject market. Information <br /> regarding the land sale comparables is presented on the Land Sales Tabulation Chart <br /> and Adjustment Grid, which follows the comparable discussion. A Land Sale Location <br /> Map is also included. <br /> Comparable 1, 4, and 5 apply to the northern portion of the subject, while Comparable <br /> 1, 2 and 3 apply to the southern portion. These comparable land sales have not been <br /> adjusted for market conditions (time). Paired sales analyses is the typical method used <br /> for establishing market conditions adjustments. There were no reasonable paired sales <br /> from which to calculate an adjustment, therefore, one has not been utilized. The <br /> comparables selected indicate a range in value, from $1,893 to $70,000 per acre. <br /> Comparable 1 ($21,600 /acre) is the sale of approximately 50 acres of land near Bailey <br /> Hill Road in Eugene, OR. The property was in close proximity to the City of Eugene UGB <br /> and a proposed city park. The site was sold to the City of Eugene to be used for part of <br /> the Ridgeline Trail System. The total sales price was $1,080,000. However, the city paid <br /> $675,000 in cash. The remaining $405,000 was donated by the sellers. The total sales <br /> price of $1,080,000 was arrived at via an appraisal by a local appraisal company. • The <br /> site was appraised as three acreage homesites. The subject has permission for four <br /> dwellings, similar to the comparable. On balance, this comparable is a reasonable <br /> indicator for the northern portion of the subject. It is a high indicator for the southem <br /> portion. <br /> Comparable 2 ($1,893 /acre) is the sale of 845 acres in Cottage Grove, slightly south of <br /> the subject. The comparable is located just off Interstate -5, similar to the subject and <br /> has easy access from this Interstate. The site was not buildable at the time of sale and <br /> will likely never gain a building permit. It is improved with several types of trees, <br /> however, very few were marketable at the time of sale. It was sold as an investment <br /> property for future timber production or development. This comparable was included <br /> in this analysis as it has a similar zoning when compared to the subject and is also very <br /> large and in close proximity. Although, it is similar, inferior Cottage Grove location and <br /> lack of a building permit make this a low indicator for the subject's southern portion. <br />