New Search
My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
New Search
Arlie Purchase, Ridgeline Trail
COE
>
PW
>
POS_PWM
>
Parks
>
POS Director
>
Arlie Purchase, Ridgeline Trail
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/6/2014 11:52:28 AM
Creation date
8/6/2014 11:52:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PW_Operating
PW_Document_Type_ Operating
Correspondence
PW_Division
Parks and Open Space
Document_Number
Suzanne Arlie Park
External_View
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
122
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Good evening, I'm Teresa Bishow with Arlie & Company. <br /> In an RG editorial last month, the council was advised to be cautious about our offer to sell land south of <br /> LCC for a park. The editorial suggests that since we filed for Chapter 11 reorganization, the city has <br /> leverage to negotiate a lower asking price. <br /> Actually, once we filed for Chapter 11, we can only sell land as authorized by a federal judge. Since time <br /> is critical, acting in good faith, City staff toured the property and prepared a Letter of Intent to purchase <br /> 315 acres. As required by federal law, the Letter of Intent was circulated to the banks, other creditors <br /> and the general public. All parties had an opportunity to tour the property and the right to file an <br /> objection. At the end of a required 30 day period there were no objections filed to the proposed sale. <br /> The price per acre for the majority of the land being sold is 50% below the appraised value. A reduction <br /> in the sale price would require a second public notice period and would likely generate an objection <br /> from our bank or another creditor. The banks want more of their money back, not less. Furthermore, <br /> the Letter of Intent includes a closing deadline of 12/31/10. There isn't enough time to go back to the <br /> federal judge with a new Letter of Intent. <br /> The editorial suggests Arlie's latest proposal gives the city the best hope of getting Arlie's $600,000 <br /> donation for park improvements. This is true. We want to honor our pledge and the federal judge has <br /> granted us the authority to do so consistent with the Letter of Intent. <br /> Lastly, the editorial admonishes the council not to shortcut the City's normal guidelines for naming <br /> parks. Actually, the guidelines clearly give the City staff the ability to refer any naming decisions to the <br /> council. This is not a shortcut. It is an available option that staff decided to take. We believe that the <br /> substantial financial donation by Arlie & Company both in land and cash meets the intent of the naming <br /> guidelines. <br /> As you consider this matter at a council meeting on November 8 I hope you act favorably to enhance <br /> the park system. <br /> Thank you. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.