Page 2 <br /> 11/16/2010 <br /> As you know, City staff expressed an interest in purchasing a large block of land south of the trail <br /> corridor and two smaller pieces of property on the north side. Arlie & Company signed the LOI <br /> prepared by the City agreeing to sell approximately 315 acres. Land on the south side is being sold <br /> at $5,000 per care (50% below appraised value) and land on the north side is being sold at $18,000 <br /> per acre (10% below the appraised value). <br /> WHAT IS THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE $600,000 DONATION AND THE PURCHASE PRICE? <br /> As stated in the Letter of Intent, the City would purchase approximately 315 acres for approximately <br /> $1.944 million. As part of the real estate transaction, Arlie & Company would donate back to the City <br /> $600,000 for park-related purposes. The donated funds would come directly from the money <br /> received from the City for the purchase of the property. The donated funds would not be limited to <br /> the ridgeline trail and could be used at the City's sole discretion for any park - related purpose, <br /> including maintenance. <br /> WHAT ASPECTS OF THE LOI ARE NEGOTIABLE? <br /> Upon receipt of the Letter of Intent from the City, all parties to the Chapter 11 bankruptcy <br /> proceedings and the public were informed of the L0l, offered the ability to tour the property and <br /> provided an opportunity to file an objection to the sale. At the conclusion of the required 30 day <br /> period, no objections were filed. On October 15, 2010 the U.S. Bankruptcy Judge filed an order <br /> granting Arlie & Company the authority to sell property to the City. The order states that the <br /> purchase and sale agreement "shall be substantially the same as the Letter of Intent and shall not <br /> be materially less favorable to the Debtor..." (A copy of the court order is enclosed.) <br /> According to the court order, any substantive or material change to the provisions in the LOI would <br /> not give Arlie & Company the authority to sell the property and would likely not be acceptable to <br /> Umpqua Bank and Arlie's other creditors. For example, if the City wants to make a minor adjustment <br /> to the total acreage of land being purchased (and thus the total sale amount) this would not require <br /> going back thru the process. Arlie & Company would be able to continue to donate $600,000 to the <br /> City. However, if the City wants to decrease the purchase price per acre, this would require going <br /> back to the U.S. Bankruptcy Judge for approval. It would also require providing new notice of the <br /> lower sale price with the opportunity for any Chapter 11 party, including the public, to file an <br /> objection to the sale. An objection to the sale is now more likely due to the recent comparable sale <br /> of the Wildish property for a county park at a fair market value equal to $18,500 per acre. <br /> Arlie & Company is also not willing to go back thru the Chapter 11 procedure since, as stated in the <br /> LOI, the transaction must close by December 31, 2010. This condition in the L0l gives Arlie & <br /> Company substantial tax benefits for the year 2009 and is one of the reasons why Umpqua Bank <br /> supported the sale. Without those tax savings, we question whether the bank would be on board <br /> with the sale at the discounted price especially given the recent comparable sale of Wildish property. <br /> PARK NAME <br /> In the prior sale agreement the City agreed to name the trail the "Suzanne Arlie Ridgeline Trail <br /> Corridor ". If the City only purchased additional park land south of the trail corridor, the discounted <br /> sale price would be equivalent to a 50% donation in land area. Arlie & Company preferred not to <br /> sell land north of the trail corridor, but at the request of City staff agreed to do so at a discounted <br /> price of 10% below appraised value. If the City purchases the land as described in the LOI, the <br /> combined discounted sale price would be equivalent to a 46% donation in land area. This is a <br /> substantial donation especially given these challenging economic times. As stated in the LOI, with <br />