New Search
My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
New Search
Moon Mountain
COE
>
PW
>
POS_PWM
>
Parks
>
Specific Parks
>
Moon Mountain
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/6/2014 9:00:01 AM
Creation date
8/6/2014 8:59:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PW_Operating
PW_Document_Type_ Operating
Correspondence
PW_Division
Parks and Open Space
Identification_Number
Moon Mountain
External_View
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MEMORANDUM <br /> October 16, 1997 <br /> TO: Johnny Medlin <br /> FROM: John Etter <br /> SUBJECT: Criteria and rationale for acquiring Moon Mountain Park <br /> Moon Mountain has been judged in various publically adopted planning documents as one of <br /> those special topographic and natural resource features that is judged worthy of being preserved <br /> for the enjoyment by the general public, as well as the integrity of a natural resources system and <br /> recreation potential. It is in the same category as Spencer Butte, Baldy (east of Dillard Road), <br /> Gillespie Butte, Hendricks Park, and the Willamette Riverfront Park system which includes the <br /> Delta Ponds. <br /> Three elements of the Metro Plan address the value of lands that typically constitute the natural <br /> open space which characterizes metropolitan class parks. Several objective and policy <br /> statements within those elements are germane to the issue of acquiring Moon Mountain for a <br /> park. In the Environmental Resources Element, they include (beginning on p. III -C -9 of the <br /> Metro Plan): <br /> 14. Metropolitan Goal relating to scenic quality, water quality, vegetation and <br /> wildlife, open space, and recreational potential shall be given higher priority than timber <br /> harvest within the urban growth boundary. <br /> 18. Local governments shall develop plans and programs which carefully manage <br /> development on hillsides and in water bodies and restrict development in wetlands in <br /> order to protect the scenic quality, surface water and groundwater quality, forest values, <br /> vegetation, and wildlife values of those areas. <br /> 25. When planning for and regulating development, local governments shall each <br /> continue to consider the need for protection of open spaces, including those characterized <br /> by significant vegetation and wildlife. Means of protecting open space include but are <br /> not limited to outright acquisition, conservation easements, planned unit development <br /> ordinances,....donations to the public, and performance zoning. <br /> In the Environmental Design Element, they include (beginning on p.III -E -3): <br /> 5. (Objective) Enhance views and public use of river corridors, drainage ways, and <br /> prominent topographic features, such as ridgelines and buttes, within the jurisdiction of <br /> the Metropolitan Plan, when consistent with other planning policies. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.