Tim Rhay <br /> 10 <br /> 10 <br /> VintliNijiartiiiiiinialpiAMINENNIEMEgligit 10 <br /> 9 <br /> 9 <br /> 9 <br /> "'' 10 <br /> 10 <br /> 10 49 ..::...::::::::..:...:.:.:.::::. ............................... <br /> 48 <br /> 1 <br /> 0 <br /> 10 <br /> 7 7 <br /> 5 <br /> 4 <br /> 22 <br /> 21 <br /> :. ..........:::::: <br /> 10 10 <br /> 13 <br /> 14 <br /> 23 24 <br /> 94 93 <br /> • Reed's approach to use of field staff as information resource (only) more appropriate, but <br /> still realistic. Satre team did not appear to foresee need of field staff input. <br /> • Reed group had anticipated need to involve /take input from park neighbors and <br /> anticipated /expressed willingness to interview each if necessary. This demonstrated <br /> forethought and a good grasp of community dynamics. <br /> • Satre group's approach, in general, seems more academic /office /research oriented. Reed <br /> group's approach combines more field/hands -on/on -site effort with academic research. <br /> • Local residence of Reed's team can not help but facilitate on -site research as well as <br /> communication with City staff and DAC members. <br />