New Search
6/17/92 <br /> Lee: Shawn had a lot of questions about the golden gardens item. He would <br /> like them addressed in the agenda packet for this item. Here they are: <br /> 1. How can we guarantee public access to the golf course in perpetuity? <br /> 2. How do SDCs apply to this development? (There is no mention in the ma- <br /> terial sent to Council.) <br /> 3. Did staff consider other options for this land - Shawn suggested some- <br /> thing such as SDCs as credit for the full purchase price. <br /> 4. Shawn would like to know what the soil classification is - is it possible <br /> to rent our Golden Gardens site for agriculture use? <br /> 5. June 11 letter from Sagen: <br /> item c - are they going to pay family wages? <br /> item d - one letter refers to the golf course as a buffer - another refers <br /> to the park as a buffer. What is their definition of a buffer and what would <br /> the size be? <br /> last paragraph: Shawn thinks mitigation plans should require a signoff on <br /> wetlands. Is this the case? <br /> page 2 - the statement about "conserving water" raised some questions for <br /> him. Shawn wonders what the source of the water is and whether it is a State <br /> resource or a City resource. He also wonders how much water they are talking <br /> about. <br /> 6. 6/9 letter from Babb <br /> Shawn wants us to clarify to the attorney and developers, etc. that staff is <br /> "not in support" of this development - it's a City Council decision. <br /> In their letter: <br /> item 1 - can we guarantee this with a deed restriction? Other options? <br /> item 3 - this is the same question about the buffer definition. <br /> item 4 - are they willing to be responsible for solving any environmental <br /> problems in perpetuity? <br /> in regard to staff providing "political support," Shawn wants to know if <br /> that would be at their cost, rather than City cost. <br /> in terms of paying development costs - does that include SDCs? <br /> in terms of asking that we let them know immediately of other concerns, <br /> Shawn wants them to know that Council doesn't know enough about the project <br /> yet to know if they have other concerns. Most of his are in this note to <br /> you. <br />