New Search
mind for a consumption which should not be exceeded, such limitation should <br /> be identified early in the process. <br /> 6. Concerning staff vs. Council support (staff support was acknowledged in <br /> the Babb letter of 6/9): staff have felt some latitude to discuss the pro- <br /> posal based on the Eugene Parks and Recreation Plan. The implementation <br /> scenario is developing other than called for in the Plan, and therefore mer- <br /> its particular review, guidance and approval from the Council. We look for <br /> direction from you on how to proceed and the level of support to give. <br /> Also in the Babb letter: <br /> Questions on items 1 and 3 are answered above. <br /> Who is "our" in "our mutual objective" on page 2, paragraph 7? We understand <br /> that to mean the City in general (because of the Parks and Recreation Plan) <br /> and the golf proposers. <br /> 7. Back to 5/14 letter from Sagen, last paragraph: Tax lot 103 was the as- <br /> sumed location of a new park. Their offer was to perform park development on <br /> that site simultaneously with golf course development -- grading, turf, irriga- <br /> tion, etc. -- assuming that it would be cost beneficial to the city. The value <br /> of the work they would do, however, would not exceed the difference in value <br /> between the parcels traded. (We assume the current park value is greater <br /> than a new smaller one.) <br /> 1 LAS <br /> L ,"Q, ?PO °441 <br /> S I J ( u .,t,. <br /> n I ,:hew <br /> C G ttf 1 � I � �' t / , * j tj <br /> „ajcu, d Sap eaver <br />