New Search
My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
New Search
Hendricks Park
COE
>
PW
>
POS_PWM
>
Parks
>
Specific Parks
>
Hendricks Park
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/30/2014 10:04:14 AM
Creation date
7/30/2014 10:04:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PW_Operating
PW_Document_Type_ Operating
Correspondence
PW_Division
Parks and Open Space
External_View
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
evidenced by sand bags 1 foot in height and 40 feet in length in use in the rear of 1919 <br /> Fircrest Drive. That address also has a driveway that is always wet, even on the driest <br /> and hottest days. Surface water and excessive irrigation can only amplify supersaturated <br /> soil conditions. I personally can attest to these excessively wet conditions since for at <br /> least eighteen years my backyard on the border of the park has been supersaturated in <br /> winter. <br /> One tree, Number 53 should be removed. This is based upon the small size, the amount <br /> of fungus in the stem- potentially spread among other trees - and minimal damage to • <br /> canopy. The remaining 17 should be spared. Number 28, estimated at 105 years old - <br /> should be designated as a "habitat" tree and left without limbs. This tree could stand for <br /> 10+ years before removal is necessary. <br /> Back to the remaining 16 trees. Many of these trees are historical by any measure, i. e. <br /> 100+ years in age. To condemn these trees in 1997 as "unsafe" and have them removed <br /> is not necessary. It is at best a subjective call as to how to preserve the aesthetics of the <br /> park and to provide an acceptable level of risk for both neighbors and visitors. Removing <br /> trees opens the canopy of the stand of trees which can itself cause of trees to fail due to <br /> shifting wind conditions. Removal of trees could increase the possibility of mud- slides. <br /> All healthy trees are essential for the preservation of the canopy. We are dealing with a <br /> natural matter and consequently do not have all of the factors to make accurate <br /> predictions with a degree of certainty. <br /> The most intense storm in modem history was the `62 Columbus Day storm which these <br /> trees stood even though they were in excess of 70 years old. In December 1996, an <br /> atmospheric low of similar intensity blew two of my 40 year old firs down because of <br /> excessive soil moisture and wind load. Interestingly enough all of 18 survived. <br /> Predicting tree failure is not an exact science. <br /> Short of removing all trees, some degree of risk must be accepted. Since these 17 and <br /> many other trees in the park have lived on average in excess of 100 years we must err on <br /> the side of nature and balance this decision by monitoring these trees annually. This <br /> solution will retain the character of the park and also keep safety as a major factor. <br /> Wad- L. Harrison <br /> 19 . Fircrest Drive <br /> Eugene OR 97403 c:l msofcelwinwordlharrisonitrees .doc <br /> *There is one exception: a 300 year old fir that suffered stem failure. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.