New Search
HAMMITT Bob <br /> From: JENNINGS Carrie A <br /> To: HAMMITT Bob <br /> Subject: FW: Hendricks Park Trees <br /> Date: Monday, October 13, 1997 9:36AM <br /> Hi Bob, <br /> Will you please read this note from the bottom up and let me know what my next step should be. <br /> Thanks <br /> From: PLAMONDON Scott F <br /> To: JENNINGS Carrie A <br /> Subject: RE: Hendricks Park Trees <br /> Date: Monday, October 13, 1997 9:06AM <br /> Carrie, I am more comfortable that this is handled by Bob or Chris since it deals with how to give <br /> information out. Thanks Scott <br /> From: JENNINGS Carrie A <br /> To: PLAMONDON Scott F <br /> Subject: FW: Hendricks Park Trees <br /> Date: Monday, October 13, 1997 7:53AM <br /> Hi Scott, <br /> Please read this note from the bottom up and let me know how you wish me to proceed. <br /> Thanks, Carrie <br /> From: Suzanne Clark <br /> To: JENNINGS Carrie A <br /> Subject: Re: Hendricks Park Trees <br /> Date: Saturday, October 11, 1997 3:34PM <br /> Carrie, <br /> How does sending me recommendations after the meeting enable me to write <br /> comments that other members of the sub -group might read? Won't the group <br /> imagine that I didn't care enough either to appear or to comment? How will <br /> others know that you have scheduled the meeting at a time I can't be there, <br /> and that I have opinions and responses that I can't give them? As you <br /> know, I do question the propriety of assembling such a group as an advisory <br /> body; I don't want to offer the city advice that ought to be expert - -and <br /> don't believe the group should do so either. However, it seems to me that <br /> this additional meeting is being called with the assumption that the group <br /> IS to have an advisory function, and I'd like my perspective not to be <br /> silenced. <br /> Suzanne <br /> 03:17 PM 10/10/97 -0700, you wrote: <br /> >Hi Suzanne, <br /> >Scott's tree assessment is not in its finalized version yet. I think <br /> >what I should do is wait until the morning after the meeting to e-mail <br /> >them to you. With the controversial nature of this issue, I would hate <br /> >for one member of the sub -group to see his recommendations before the <br /> >rest. I will e-mail this and any other pertinent information to you on <br /> >October 20th (the Monday after the meeting), for your review. This will <br /> >still give you some time to comment before the final decision is made <br /> >and announced at the large group meeting on the 28th. <br /> Page 1 <br />