New Search
There are 6 trees I have identified and recommend for immediate removal due to their advanced <br /> state of decay and the risk of harm they pose to the public. These are numbered; R28, R -53, <br /> R68, R87, R90, R112. In agreement with the opinion of the two recent consultants, I do not <br /> feel the removal of these trees will substantially impact the stability of the remaining trees. In <br /> fact their removal will allow more room for the crowns on the more healthier trees to grow and <br /> develop. <br /> If desired, these trees with the most potential for failure can be removed this fall with the others <br /> being periodically monitored to assess when changes occur that can cause a more immediate <br /> failure of the tree. The trees to be put on the monitoring list have in some instances less decay <br /> and disease, but they still have the potential of root failure similar to the tree that failed last <br /> winter. <br /> The remaining trees can then be put on a monitoring list to be periodically inspected and <br /> examined to identify changes that can lead to their failure. There are 12 trees in this group <br /> numbered; R -24, R -25, R -46, R -47, R -60, R -70, R -71, R -76, R -77, R -83, R -86, and R -93. <br /> Please advise as to how you want to pursue or not to pursue these removals. <br />