New Search
15. Would you be more likely to SUPPORT or OPPOSE the project if you knew that: without the <br /> housing development, acquiring the targeted park site and ridgeline would involve government <br /> condemnation of property? <br /> 1O Oppose <br /> 2() Lean toward oppose <br /> 3( ) No difference/Don't know <br /> 4() Lean toward support <br /> 5( ) Support <br /> 6( ) I don't believe the statement <br /> 16. Would you be more likely to SUPPORT or OPPOSE the project if you knew that: condemning the <br /> targeted park site and ridgeline would cost more than the package proposed? <br /> Oppose <br /> 2() Lean toward oppose <br /> 3( ) No difference/Don't know <br /> 4() Lean toward support <br /> 5() Support <br /> 6( ) I don't believe the statement <br /> 17. Would you be more likely to SUPPORT or OPPOSE the project if you knew that: the project would <br /> allow a housing development on prime agricultural land? <br /> 1 () Oppose <br /> 2() Lean toward oppose <br /> 3( ) No difference/Don't know <br /> 4( ) Lean toward support <br /> 5() Support <br /> 6() I don't believe the statement <br /> 18. Would you be more likely to SUPPORT or OPPOSE the project if you knew that: without the land <br /> trade proposal, the developer wants to develop the entire parcel with housing? <br /> 1 ()Oppose <br /> 2() Lean toward oppose <br /> 3( ) No difference/Don't know <br /> 4( ) Lean toward support <br /> 5O Support <br /> 6() I don't believe the statement <br /> 19. Would you be more likely to SUPPORT or OPPOSE the project if you knew that: only the land sited <br /> for development would be annexed as part of this project? <br /> 1 () Oppose <br /> 2( ) Lean toward oppose <br /> 3( ) No difference/Don't know <br /> 4() Lean toward support <br /> 5() Support <br /> 6( ) I don't believe the statement <br />