Special District White Paper — Draft for Internal Review <br /> The Boundary Commission or County Board may approve the formation petition as submitted, <br /> approve it with boundary modifications only, or deny the request. If the Boundary Commission <br /> approves the petition it forwards its final order to the County Board. If the proposal is for <br /> formation of a district and a permanent tax rate limit for operating revenues is proposed, placing <br /> the proposal on a primary or general election ballot is mandatory, and it is subject to the <br /> constitutional double majority requirement. The single question placed on the ballot is to contain <br /> two parts: (a) should the district be formed and (b) should the proposed permanent operating <br /> tax rate limit be approved. (Details on the necessary steps are listed in Appendix F.) <br /> The double majority requirement may be difficult to meet. In many primary elections, a majority <br /> of electors may not vote and the measure then cannot pass even if it gets the support of a <br /> majority of those voting. Many governments prefer to place revenue measures on the general <br /> election ballot in an even- numbered year, which is a permitted alternative to the double majority <br /> requirement. This defines the timeframe for formation of a new special district with a permanent <br /> maximum rate limit. The next general election ballot in Oregon will be on November 5, 2002. If a <br /> measure is to go on the 2002 general ballot and appear in the City voters' pamphlet, it must be <br /> fully approved by the undary Comrnissi or County Board and; -- ready#or the ballot by <br /> mid - August, 2002. Si a the M tr Plan must b amended in a process that clan take 12 <br /> months, this timeline i ur`r alistic,I The general klption in November2004; which is a <br /> presidential election y ar, is prop bly-a -more realistic target date: <br /> } <br /> Appendix G shows co p rafivejti elinespr ffrn1ation•:processes targeting both the 2002 and <br /> the 2004 November a ect on's ss umin0 comprehensive plan changes: will be required, property <br /> taxes will be used to finance �erations 'pf ti\e di;;tnc{, and the question is placed on the general <br /> election ballot. <br /> Annexation of Territory to a Special District <br /> An annexation proposal to join an area to an existing special district may be initiated by <br /> resolution of the affected district board, by petition of electors, by resolution of the Boundary <br /> Commission for districts under its jurisdiction. If the annexation proposal includes the territory of <br /> a city, the city council must have approved the petition prior to filing. Territory within an existing <br /> special district may not be annexed to another district subject to the same principal Act. <br /> If the district is not subject to the Boundary Commission, the annexation petition is filed with the <br /> County Board of Commissioners. Again, if the annexation proposal includes the territory of a <br /> city, the city council must have approved the petition. In reviewing the petition, the Board of <br /> Commissioners is directed by statute to consider the local comprehensive plans for the area.. <br /> An election on the proposal must be held in both the district and the area proposed for <br /> annexation. This would apply to county road districts and port districts. A simple majority in <br /> both the district and the territory proposed for annexation is required; the double majority <br /> requirement does not apply to annexation elections. <br /> The Boundary Commission has jurisdiction in the case of annexation to a park and recreation <br /> district, county service district, rural fire protection district or library district. In this case, the <br /> County is not involved, and the annexation proposal is filed with the Boundary Commission. <br /> Once all filing requirements have been met, the Commission must act upon the proposal within <br /> 90 days of submission unless the involved parties agree to a postponement. If the Commission <br /> Draft #5 Page 21 10/24/01 <br />