New Search
My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
New Search
Special Districts
COE
>
PW
>
POS_PWM
>
Parks
>
General Parks Info
>
Special Districts
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/10/2014 11:48:20 AM
Creation date
7/10/2014 11:48:10 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PW_Operating
PW_Document_Type_ Operating
Correspondence
PW_Division
Parks and Open Space
External_View
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
93
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Special District White Paper — Draft for Internal Review <br /> • Service or user fees may be charged. <br /> • Property taxes may be levied to support operations. The Oregon Constitution requires that a <br /> permanent operating property tax rate limit must be approved prior to the levying of property <br /> taxes. The statutes don't specify a maximum amount of operating property tax revenue that <br /> may be collected. <br /> • A special property tax levy may also be collected for facility construction, consistent with the <br /> district's master facilities plan. This levy may not exceed $0.50 per $1000 RMV per year for <br /> a maximum of five years. This would generate net revenue of $49.3 million annually based <br /> on Eugene's FY01 AV. This revenue is to be placed in a revolving fund for the purposes <br /> allowed in the principal Act. <br /> • GO Bonding may not exceed 13% of RMV or $1.38 billion dollars within Eugene for FY01. <br /> GO bond levies are outside the constitutional general government limit. <br /> • Local option levies under ORS Chapter 280 are allowed. <br /> It is important to consider all services that may be desired through a CSD and set the district's <br /> permanent maximum property tax rate limit at a level that will produce adequate revenue for <br /> those services. Once passed by the voters, the rate limit cannot be changed, even if new <br /> services are later aut orized'and delivered} CSp have other, sources Of revenue, in <br /> particular assessment , which ray supportson1e services. <br /> I <br /> Port District i ; <br /> Port districts may issue a j varietX o f b nds;and'charge user fees, connection fees, property <br /> assessments, and promissory n tes.Ports \may also may' develop, rent, lease or sell land for <br /> industrial and research pdrposess. `Property ices be collected for a special bond sinking <br /> fund; these taxes may be uppd the amount ua1 to 0.2A% of RMV of taxable property in the <br /> district. This is equivalent to about13.50 per $1600 FY01 AV in Eugene maximum annual <br /> sinking fund revenue within Eugene of $24.7 million based on FY01 AV. GO bonds are <br /> permitted for capital projects, and revenue bonds may be issued with voter approval. The port <br /> district may loan out proceeds of revenue bonds. <br /> Single - purpose vs. Multiple - purpose Special Districts <br /> The main advantage of single - purpose special districts is that they are formed for one primary <br /> purpose and can concentrate their efforts and resources toward that purpose. The elected <br /> board member for the single - purpose district (with the exception of county road districts, where <br /> the county board serves as district board) will typically be focused on district services and will be <br /> directly accountable to the voters for district outcomes. Formation of a single - purpose district will <br /> probably be simpler than forming a district with multiple purposes. <br /> However, having an array of special districts in the metropolitan area, in addition to city and <br /> county governments, can become confusing and possibly be administratively top -heavy for the <br /> level of services provided. Overlapping single - purpose districts and cities may have different <br /> boundaries, resulting in patchy service delivery and taxation patterns throughout the region. <br /> Reaching consensus among several districts and governments with different purposes and <br /> purposes can be complex. Political discussion may be fragmented because each service <br /> provider has a separate board of directors with different purposes, visions and philosophies, and <br /> is accountable to differing constituencies. <br /> Draft #5 Page 17 10/24/01 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.