Special District White Paper <br /> L <br /> After receiving a petition, the Boundary Commission must conduct a study, hold one or more public <br /> hearings, make a decision and file its final order within 120 days. The Commission must base its <br /> order on the study and hearings. These specific statutory requirements do not apply to the County <br /> Board in the case of a port district or county road district, although the Board also must hold one or <br /> more hearings on a petition related to these special districts. <br /> The Boundary Commission or County Board may approve the formation petition as submitted, <br /> approve it with boundary modifications only, or deny the request. If the Boundary Commission <br /> approves the petition it forwards its final order to the County Board. If the proposal is for formation <br /> of a district and a permanent tax rate limit for operating revenues is proposed, placing the proposal <br /> on a primary or general election ballot is mandatory, and it is subject to the constitutional double <br /> majority requirement. The single question placed on the ballot is to contain two parts: (a) should the <br /> district be formed and (b) should the proposed permanent operating tax rate limit be approved. <br /> (Details on the necessary steps are listed in Appendix F.) <br /> The double majority requirement may be difficult to meet. In many primary elections, a majority of <br /> electors may not vote and the measure then cannot pass even if it gets the support of a majority of <br /> those voting. Many governments prefer to place revenue measures on the general election ballot in <br /> an even - numbered year, which is a permitted alternative to the double majority requirement. This <br /> defines the timeframe for formation of a new special district with a permanent rate limit. <br /> The next general election ballot in Oregon will be on November 5, 2002. If a measure is to go on <br /> the 2002 general ballot and appear in the City voters' pamphlet, it must be fully approved by the <br /> Boundary Commission or County Board and be ready for the ballot by mid - August, 2002. Since the <br /> Metro Plan must be amended in a process that can take 12 months, this timeline is unrealistic. On <br /> the other hand the general election in November 2004, which is a presidential election year, is a <br /> realistic target date. <br /> Appendix G shows comparative timelines for formation processes targeting both the 2002 and the <br /> 2004 November elections, assuming comprehensive plan changes will be required, property taxes <br /> will be used to finance operations of the district, and the question is placed on the general election <br /> ballot. <br /> Annexation of Territory to a Special District <br /> An annexation proposal to join an area to an existing special district may be initiated by resolution <br /> of the affected district board, by petition of electors, by resolution of the Boundary Commission for <br /> districts under its jurisdiction. If the annexation proposal includes the territory of a city, the city <br /> council must have approved the petition prior to filing. Territory within an existing special district <br /> may not be annexed to another district subject to the same principal Act. <br /> If the district is not subject to the Boundary Commission, the annexation petition is filed with the <br /> County Board of Commissioners. Again, if the annexation proposal includes the territory of a city, <br /> the city council must have approved the petition. In reviewing the petition, the Board of <br /> Commissioners is directed by statute to consider the local comprehensive plans for the area. An <br /> election on the proposal must be held in both the district and the area proposed for annexation. This <br /> would apply to county road districts and port districts. A simple majority in both the district and the <br /> Special Districts Paper - Final 11- 8- 01.doc Page 21 of 41 <br /> City Council Agenda page 45 <br />