New Search
• <br /> n <br /> CITY ATTORNEY — CIVIL DEPARTMENT <br /> Planning Commission - February 6, 1985 <br /> affected persons, then that person or persons need the following: <br /> 1. Individual notice of the proceeding with <br /> -_� a description of the proposed action; <br /> 2. Unbiased decisionmakers, i.e., a declaration <br /> of bias and ex parte contacts as to the part of the <br /> proceedings affecting the individual; <br /> 3. Opportunity to be heard in the proceedings • <br /> with a right of rebuttal as to evidence relevant to <br /> that party's concerns; <br /> 4. Particular findings on that interest or <br /> property which justify the decision reached. <br /> These protections would be afforded where, for example, <br /> a plan change for a particular parcel occurs in the context <br /> of legislative changes to the plan, e.g., Emporium plan change <br /> and Mid - period review of the Metro Plan. <br /> I will be available at your meeting of February 11 to discuss <br /> these observations and answer any questions you might have. <br /> HARRANG, SWANSON, LONG & <br /> WATKINSON, P.C. - CITY ATTORNEYS <br /> Timothy . ercombe <br /> TJS:jw <br /> IV -4 <br />