CITY OF EUGENE <br /> INTER - DEPARTMENTAL MEMORANDUM <br /> CITY ATTORNEY - CIVIL DEPARTMENT <br /> To: Eric Jones Date: January 26, 1998 <br /> PWA <br /> Subject: Posting of Handbills <br /> You have asked whether the provisions in EC 4.050 and 4.060 prohibit City employees from <br /> posting notices or handbills on property where the owner or resident has indicated an intent to <br /> exclude others. For the reasons that follow, City employees may not enter public property to post <br /> notices or handbills unless such information is required or authorized by federal, state, or local law. <br /> Absent legislative authorization or consent of the resident, no person may enter property that <br /> is clearly posted "No Trespassing" or "Keep Out." Such authorization can be in the form of a statute <br /> or ordinance that authorizes or requires posting notice on the premises. Therefore, if a state statute <br /> or City ordinance does not provide authorization for placing handbills on private property, City <br /> employees may not enter property where the resident or owner has posted a "No Trespassing" sign <br /> or the equivalent. With this general principle in mind, we address the specific provisions to which <br /> you refer. <br /> EC 4.060 prohibits the placing of handbills by a "person" on private property where the <br /> occupants of the premises have indicated a desire to keep persons from entering the premises. The <br /> definition of "person" arguably includes city employees placing handbills on private property. <br /> Nevertheless, EC 4.060 would not prohibit city employees from posting notices required by federal, <br /> state or local law. If state or federal law requires the City to post notices on private property, EC <br /> 4.060 would be inconsistent with federal or state law and preempted. For example, ORS 570.190 <br /> authorizes notice of nuisance abatement, inspection or quarantine through posting if the owner <br /> cannot otherwise be notified. A city ordinance could not prohibit entry on private property to post <br /> the information required by state law. <br /> Similarly, EC 4.060 would not displace a local ordinance that specifically authorizes or <br /> requires a city employee to place handbills on private property. Therefore, a City ordinance <br /> requiring or authorizing the placement of notices on private property would be considered an <br /> exception to EC 4.060. See, e.g., EC 6.080 (notice of nuisance abatement). <br /> In contrast, EC 4.050 applies to public ways and other, enumerated public places. It does not <br /> apply to notices posted on private residences and further exempts notices otherwise authorized or <br /> required by law. Therefore, this ordinance does not affect the City's authority 'to post notices or <br /> handbills on private property. <br />