New Search
"4.19 Allow development wetlands that meet the criteria for wetland development <br /> contained in Appcndix B of the Plan Polirey 3 18, as illustrated on Map 3." <br /> G. Move Policy 4.20 to Chapter 3 and amend as follows: <br /> "1.20 , :. - • <br /> ...: ; , .. <br /> Apply these tcp criteri • <br /> to .. ®elineated etl r`. d determine tti r <br /> protectio d Iopent status." <br /> H. Amend definition of "rare species" as follows: <br /> "RARE SPECIES: e - - - . . • ; - - ' ; - - ; - - • - - ,- - : -' -- - • - . • <br /> '+ i Y Q all ste ws t reattenedfi endangered a a® d :� � hich <br /> e p.. "�, . s s. '' +, a Plant ems` <br /> Witti OW which-was Top once widespread, but-is M now extremely limited in its <br /> distribution. For example the prairie grasslands once covered thousands of acres in the <br /> Willamette Valley, but now are restricted to fewer than 20 locations in Lane and Benton <br /> Counties." <br /> Update information on lists of sites in each wetland value category in Appendix C: <br /> "Wetland Value Criteria <br /> The following criteria shall be used to determine wetland value categories for applying <br /> setbacks, buffer requirements and other protection measures applied to wetlands designated for <br /> protection on Map 3. <br /> High value wetland sites must meet at least five out of the following seven criteria: <br /> a. site is relatively undisturbed <br /> b. site contains rare plant species, Deschampsia cespitosa, or other unique <br /> and diverse plant communities <br /> c. site is large or is contiguous with another wetland or waterway <br /> d. site is actually or potentially part of a connected wetland system <br /> e. site contains a locally significant or rare habitat type <br /> f. site received a Wetland Evaluation Technique rating of 50 or greater <br /> g. site received a Wildlife Habitat Assessment rating of 60 or greater <br />