New Search
Next Steps <br /> At this point we are ready to refine and finalize the 1996 work program. To do this, additional <br /> funding information is needed from partners. It may also be necessary for partners to define their <br /> priorities more precisely, in case not all of the projects can be accomplished in 1996. <br /> We could then proceed in one of two ways: <br /> 1) Hold a joint planning meeting with WET partners and youth providers to divide the <br /> workload. This would allow for the design of a "customized" work program for each youth <br /> provider, i.e., one that offers the most attractive combination of the timing and types of work. <br /> 2) Match each youth provider with one or two of the partners (for example: NYC with Eugene, <br /> Looking Glass with TNC and BLM). The youth providers would then work separately with <br /> the partners to solidify a work program. <br /> Questions WET May Want to Consider <br /> • Is the youth strategy for 1996 on the right track? <br /> • Is WET interested in beginning to discuss a longer term youth corps strategy for west <br /> Eugene? <br /> Attachment: <br /> • Possible Youth Work Project for 1996 (matrix) <br /> LCOG: L: \WETLANDS\YOUTfi\1_22MEMO.DOC <br /> Last Saved: January 17, 1996 <br />