New Search
My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
New Search
Trees & Tree Commission
COE
>
PW
>
POS_PWM
>
Parks
>
Street Trees.Urban Forestry
>
Trees & Tree Commission
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/9/2014 2:24:44 PM
Creation date
7/9/2014 2:24:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PW_Operating
PW_Document_Type_ Operating
Correspondence
PW_Division
Parks and Open Space
External_View
No
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
344
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Alternative packages for urban forestry services should be developed. In many <br /> cases, decision makers are not familiar with the technical details of urban forestry or <br /> the intricacies of program management. The budget process may then become an <br /> educational process. Budget documents and presentations should be simple, direct <br /> and clear. Because charts and graphs communicate complex information effectively, <br /> they should be incorporated into the budget request. <br /> The first step in acheiving equity with other city services is for tree care to be <br /> perceived as an essential city service. The process begins by proving that the city's <br /> trees are assets. Not caring for them may incurr the cost of lawsuits. Good tree <br /> management does not cost, it pays. This reality needs to be clearly communicated in <br /> the budget process. <br /> Funding Sources <br /> The care of publicly owned trees is a basic city service. Although streets and utilities <br /> comprise the city's infrastructure, the trees themselves are a city's "green <br /> infrastructure". To ensure qualified staff or contractors, an urban forestry program <br /> requires adequate financing. The average annual cost per capita of comprehensive <br /> tree programs is approximately $3.50. To support urban forestry programs, <br /> citizens must understand that caring for trees benefits people as well as trees. Trees <br /> contribute to a city's physical, economic, and social welfare. If these values are <br /> understood, urban forestry can more effectively compete for scarce tax dollars and <br /> other forms of funding. <br /> A financing system for a municipal tree program should be dependable, equitable, <br /> easily administered, and consistent with community priorities. To a large extent, the <br /> care that trees receive determine their long -term value. Proper planning and <br /> maintenance can maximize the chances that the value of the urban forest will exceed <br /> the public's investment in it. Funding strategies must include a long term <br /> commitment to maintenance. <br /> A multitude of funding sources exist, each with its own advantages and <br /> disadvantages. Cities and towns must find approaches that are appropriate to local <br /> needs and cultures. The following methods have been successfully employed around <br /> the country and illustrate the opportunities for funding an urban forestry program. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.