New Search
My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
New Search
Trees & Tree Commission
COE
>
PW
>
POS_PWM
>
Parks
>
Street Trees.Urban Forestry
>
Trees & Tree Commission
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/9/2014 2:24:44 PM
Creation date
7/9/2014 2:24:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PW_Operating
PW_Document_Type_ Operating
Correspondence
PW_Division
Parks and Open Space
External_View
No
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
344
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
in parcels which are acquired by the City even if the specific tree is not <br /> removed during project construction. <br /> With the first maps the tree specialists visited the project site to verify <br /> the survey and evaluate the impacts to existing trees. They actually measured <br /> DBH (Diameter, Breast High) and determined both the species and a rough <br /> assessment of condition on all the trees close to the proposed improvement. <br /> Jan and Vic provided the condition assessment and species identification. <br /> They took fairly extensive notes which they turned over to the project team. <br /> The original information showed several trees in the wrong location and some <br /> small trees were identified as shrubs. <br /> By this point the project team had built the project base sheets and the tree <br /> . notes were incorporated into a set of trees review plans. The DBH, species, <br /> and condition were hand lettered onto a set of drawings which showed right of <br /> way and the proposed improvement alignment. Trees potentially removed as part <br /> of the construction were identifiable from the plans. The approximate impact <br /> to other existing trees adjoining the project could also be gauged. <br /> The tree specialists then did an additional field review with the updated plan <br /> sheets. Their goal was identification of trees which would require <br /> significant efforts or redesign to protect. <br /> After review the specialists gave a general verbal approval to build the <br /> project as designed. Their feeling about neighborhood trees was that even <br /> with the removals proposed a significant number of trees would remain. Many <br /> of trees to be removed were not desirable due to species, location, or <br /> condition. No trees were identified for unusual protection measures. They <br /> agreed with the removal of all trees the were indicated on the plans. They <br /> made a specific recommendation to relocate the overhead power line on the <br /> Northeast end of Bogart to the West side of the street to protect the large <br /> maples from further trimming. I agreed to work with EWEB toward that goal. <br /> Vic and Jan agreed to supply Engineering with an "opportunity plan" with <br /> recommendations as to possible sites, types, and specifications for <br /> replacement trees. Ken will refer owners to me with any tree issue questions <br /> and I will take care of offering replacement trees and placing them on the <br /> plans and will include specifications as furnished by Jan and Vic. <br /> After investigation EWEB choose to go with offset mast arms on the east side <br /> of the north end of Bogart Lane. Relocating to the west side presented <br /> problems with the tie into EWEB's existing underground vaults and some very <br /> nice, mature trees on the west side of Bogart Lane, just north of the project <br /> limits. These trees were deliberately protected during the Willikenzie Road <br /> construction project. The wires should remain in their existing location, <br /> only the poles will move. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.