/0/7/9/ <br /> Protect urban trees <br /> ore than a year ago, people in should recognize the legitimacy of ru- <br /> Eugene awoke to the fact that ral land uses. <br /> logging on land that will one As city officials prepared to rec- <br /> da y be a <br /> annexed to the city was essen- ommend a modified tree protection <br /> y unregulated. The Lane County ordinance to the county, they decided <br /> Board of Commissioners has enacted to widen the scope of their work and <br /> temporary protection, and on Tues- prepare an urban forest management <br /> day the board voted to extend it. The plan, complete with goals and poli- <br /> action was welcome and will give city cies. City officials hope that the plan <br /> officials time to continue their work will be flexible enough to govern tree - <br /> on a plan to provide permanent pro- cutting practices throughout the area <br /> tection. inside the urban growth boundary. <br /> Eugene, recognizing the value of Public hearings on the plan are about <br /> trees in urban areas, has long had an to begin, and final adoption could oc- <br /> ordinance requiring a permit for the cur next summer. <br /> cutting of more than five trees on a In the meantime, the count com- <br /> piece of property. Until last year, the n <br /> missioners have shown commendable <br /> ordinance was effective only inside <br /> Patience by keeping the existing city <br /> the city limits. This created the dan- <br /> ordinance in effect. A year's worth of <br /> ger that the trees just outside the city <br /> limits would be cut before annexa- experience with the law may have <br /> shown them that it is not as restrictive <br /> tion, badly fraying Eugene's forested <br /> fringe. as it sounds. Tree - cutting permits are <br /> seldom denied. The main effect of the <br /> IAst year brought several in- ordinance is to ensure consultation <br /> stances of such logging in areas inside before large-scale logging occurs. <br /> the urban growth boundary - the ar- Such consultation can prevent care - <br /> ea designated for eventual urban ex- less and unnecessary logging, thereby <br /> pansion — but outside the current city protecting both property owners' and <br /> limits. Such cutting was unregulated the public's interest in preserving <br /> except by zoning laws dealing with trees. <br /> the preservation of trees and forested After Eugene officials complete <br /> ridgellnes. their plan, the county board may still <br /> The county commissioners agreed find that it can't be applied outside <br /> to extend Eugene's tree-cutting ordi- the city limits without modifications. <br /> nance to cover all land within the ur- But some form of permanent protec- <br /> ban growth boundary. The county tion for trees on the land ringing Eu- <br /> board warned, however, that perma- gene should be put in place. The city's <br /> nent adoption could not occur without effort promises to yield strong and <br /> amendments. While land inside the consistent tree - protection policies <br /> urban growth boundary is destined to throughout Eugene's current and fu- <br /> • <br /> • become part of the city, its current ture area. The county board is right to <br /> character is often rural and the law give the city the time it needs. <br />