* No trees planted where soil has been completely destroyed <br /> * Tree "tombs" obsolete, every tree grows in tree -lawn, or in area of <br /> open soil with minimum of 10x15 feet <br /> * Trees on private property correctly selected and planted and cared for <br /> (thanks to community education) <br /> * Solar benefits to houses recognized when planting trees <br /> * Tree -lined skyline in south Eugene <br /> * Large trees <br /> * Handsome tree well structures <br /> * A city where nonliving entities (curbs, sidewalks, etc.) are adjusted <br /> to accommodate living things (trees, etc.) <br /> * City (agency) help (money or assistance) to remove noxious trees <br /> * Trees with urban scale <br /> C. Discussion <br /> In response to a question by Mr. Lueck, Mr. Kolb said this grouping process <br /> was to show whether there was a common vision between members. The <br /> commission would vote later when it had grouped specific action items. <br /> Mr. Lueck also questioned that most of the items listed by the commission <br /> only concerned trees. He did not want the rest of the urban forest, <br /> including shrubs, small plants, etc, to fall to the wayside. Mr. Ahlijian <br /> added that many of the items in the various categories did address those <br /> needs. <br /> In response to a question by Ms. Breen, Mr. Ahlijian explained that the Tree <br /> ( Commission was required to consider other vegetation. <br /> Ms. Bascom felt Mr. Lueck's concerns for other vegetation were important but <br /> believed the commission should consider only trees for this first 18 -month <br /> work plan. Mr. Ahlijian said the ordinance ought to be rewritten if the <br /> commission was to take such a position. Ms. Bentsen and Ms. Sirnio agreed <br /> with Ms. Bascom and believed there was a need to narrow the commission's <br /> focus. Mr. Schmaedick was especially concerned that the commission align its <br /> work plan with the original intent of the City Council. <br /> The commission discussed in depth reasons for and against limiting the <br /> concern of its first work plan to trees. Ms. Bentsen pointed out that this <br /> discussion was a result of the fact that the commission did not write the <br /> ordinance. <br /> Mr. Schmaedick moved, seconded by Mr. Friedkin, that the Tree <br /> Commission go on record as understanding that the urban forest <br /> consists of more than trees but that for the purpose of <br /> creating a work plan, it would focus on trees. <br /> Mr. Ahlijian noted his belief that if the commission continued with the <br /> workshop they would naturally come to such a conclusion. <br /> The motion carried unanimously. <br /> Mr. Kolb then suggested that the commission consider including an action item <br /> ( on the definition of an urban forest in a future meeting. <br /> MINUTES - -Tree Commission March 8, 1990 Page 5 <br />