I <br /> EUGENE Public Works <br /> Maintenance <br /> City of Eugene <br /> 1820 Roosevelt Boulevard <br /> Eugene, Oregon 97402 <br /> (541) 682 -4800 <br /> November 26, 1997 <br /> Kim DeMarcus <br /> Bennett Management Co. <br /> P.O. Box 10342 <br /> Eugene, OR 97440 <br /> Dear Kim: <br /> This letter is a follow up to the phone conversation we had a couple of weeks ago relating to a duplex <br /> property at 795/797 High Street. I looked at the site with our concrete supervisor and our Urban <br /> Forester. We focused our inspection on the first tree north of 8th Street and the following is a <br /> summary of our findings and recommendations: <br /> The trees which front the duplex are Red Maples and according to Scott Plamondon, our Urban <br /> Forester, these trees generally have a shallow root system. Since the trees are in the High Street <br /> parking strip, the trees belong to the City as opposed to the property owner. The trees in question are <br /> in good health and we do not plan to remove them. However, if the property owner removes the <br /> porch and roots are present from these trees, our tree crew staff would do some root pruning at that <br /> time. <br /> This tree's roots do extend under the sidewalk. We have a sidewalk inspection program whereby our <br /> inspector looks for and documents hazardous situations. When a sidewalk is determined hawirdous, <br /> we contact the adjacent property owner and notify them to make the repairs. The main criteria we <br /> look for while inspecting for hazards is offset sidewalk sections of 1/2" or more. Using this criteria <br /> there are no hazards fronting the duplex at this time and no need for us to contact the property owner <br /> to make repairs. <br /> While doing the site visit, we also looked at the other issues you mentioned during our telephone <br /> conversation. Those issues were the settlement of the porch, the failure of the brick planter, the rain <br /> gutter downspouts, dry rot to the building, and concern about the basement foundation. We believe <br /> the porch settlement is caused from moisture and erosion under the porch, or improper compaction of <br /> the porch bedding when the porch was constructed. Given the age of the structure we believe the <br /> settlement is more than likely caused from moisture under the porch than from improper compaction. <br /> We are comfortable that any settlement would not have been caused by tree roots, as tree roots near <br /> the ground surface and under the porch would more than likely have helped to stabilize the porch as <br /> opposed to having caused erosion. It appears the porch settlement also caused the masonry failure <br /> since the brickwork is falling forward toward the sidewalk. <br /> A close inspection of the downspout drains indicate they may be a major contributor to the moisture <br /> source. Where the downspout goes into the porch the drainpipe is necked down to a much smaller <br /> size and if plugged, or during heavy rain, the water would exit at that point as opposed to continuing <br /> through the downspout and to the drain exit. The drain itself is actually illegal since it drains on to <br />