New Search
0 <br /> HAMMITT Bob <br /> From: MEDLIN Johnny R <br /> To: LANKSTON Jeff; BRINER Cathy A <br /> Cc: HAMMITT Bob; PLAMONDON Scott F; LYLE Les A <br /> Subject: Trees <br /> Date: Thursday, June 19, 1997 3:58PM <br /> Hi Cathy, <br /> Thanks for the research you performed so quickly this afternoon. I agree tentative subdivision approval <br /> meets the criteria for permit exemption for trees to be removed on right -of -way. That has been our past <br /> practices on this type of issue. <br /> Scott will fill out the tree removal permit application form for the 5 trees on the Chambers parcel. If Jeff <br /> Lankston will provide us a drawing showing the location of the 5 trees on the Chambers parcel in <br /> relationship to the construction project, we can then forward the total package to you. Once you obtain a <br /> signature from a representative of Chambers we can then issue the permit. <br /> (Jeff, can you get Scott the above drawing ?) <br /> I believe the above will take care of all the TECHNICAL issues involving the tree removals. I haven't been <br /> in the loop about what kind of a public notification process you are going to use. Since the tree code <br /> doesn't require such notice in this case, my staff don't need to be involved unless you wish us to be. <br /> Cathy, sorry for the last minute flurry of technical details needing to be covered. However, I hope you <br /> agree that it is our best interest to cover all the possible problems early on. Things must be moving pretty <br /> quickly or I suspect we would have been brought into the process sooner. I hope everything goes well for <br /> you in this project. <br /> Thanks <br /> Johnny <br /> From: BRINER Cathy A <br /> To: LANKSTON Jeff; WILEY Diane K (UO) <br /> Cc: MEDLIN Johnny R; PLAMONDON Scott F <br /> Subject: FAX <br /> Date: Thursday, June 19, 1997 3:35PM <br /> Priority: High <br /> I am faxing you both copies of the tentative subivision approval. <br /> I talked to Jim Croteau about whether or not the trees to be <br /> removed can be considered to be in the right -of -way. It is <br /> his determination that, because the trees are located in a <br /> designated right -of -way as part of a subdivision process that <br /> has been tentatively approved, they can therefore be <br /> considered right -of -way trees & be removed without a permit. I <br /> also double- checked a city attorney opinion I got on the SPRR <br /> trees - -city attorney determined that trees in right of way or <br /> needing to be felled for a road improvement were not subject <br /> to the tree felling permit. <br /> I am hopeful that this is the end of this matter.CB <br /> Page 1 <br />