New Search
My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
New Search
Trees Policy
COE
>
PW
>
POS_PWM
>
Parks
>
Street Trees.Urban Forestry
>
Trees Policy
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/9/2014 11:22:29 AM
Creation date
7/9/2014 11:22:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PW_Operating
PW_Document_Type_ Operating
Correspondence
PW_Division
Parks and Open Space
External_View
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
59
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
TREES - EN.RFT Page 1 <br /> DRAFT <br /> September 1, 1993 <br /> TO: Bob Hammitt, Les Lyle FROM: J.R. Medlin SUBJECT: Urban Forest Management Plan (UFMP) Impact on <br /> Engineering Division <br /> On Friday August 20th, Joe Ferguson, John Etter, Louie Kroeck, Jan Staszewski, and I met to discuss the possible <br /> impacts of the UFMP on the activities of the Engineering Division. Prior to the meeting Louie had reviewed the 18 policy <br /> statements contained in the UFMP and flagged policies 1, 2, 4, 5, 7, 8, 10, 13, 14, & 15 as items of concem. <br /> POLICY 1.0 <br /> "The City will plant trees'on public property that have potential for good local performance and will, over time, achieve a <br /> diversity of species for greater stability of the urban forest. The City will recommend that trees with these characteristics <br /> be used in private developments as well." Discussion: Jan will provide a memo to Engineering prior to September 1st <br /> which will show the current list of trees available for planting and known to be viable in this region. It will be stated in the <br /> memo that this list is not all- encompassing since there are many more trees which may be suitable given special <br /> circumstances or changes in availability. Alternate trees may be proposed to the Urban Forester who will review their <br /> suitability for addition to the approved list. Where possible, Engineering should endeavor to specify various species <br /> within a project to encourage diversity. It will also be stated the the trees on the approved list are not suited for all <br /> locations and someone familiar with the growing characteristics of the selected species will need to review its <br /> appropriateness. (For Example: you wouldn't select a tree which when mature was very tall for placement under power <br /> lines.) Louie Kroeck can provide this service intemally within Engineering and Jan is available for consulting. When Jan <br /> conducts his standard review of the engineered plans these items will be a part of his review. POLICY 2.0 "The City will <br /> plant native tree species in appropriate locations on public land and encourage their use on private lands, but not to the <br /> detriment of species diversity." Discussion: Jan will identify those trees on the approved list which are native to this <br /> area. Where possible, Engineering should endeavor to make part of the species selections from this category. Jan <br /> noted that the municipal code expressly forbids certain native trees (predominately needle bearing, cottonwood and <br /> willows). While there is some disagreement within the community if some of these needle bearing trees should be <br /> restricted, none of these will be on the approved tree list unless the municipal code is changed sometime in the future. <br /> POLICY 4.0 <br /> "The City will establish or enhance the character of its streets through the use of trees in rights -of -way ". <br /> Discussion: This policy establishes that street trees are a part of the street infrastructure and the planting of trees is a <br /> requirement where space is available within the right-of-way unless otherwise restricted by a conflict. Engineering would <br /> be responsible to evaluate conflicts with other infrastructure items and document the justification for the decision if trees <br /> are not planted. This may need to be coordinated with any right -of -way width analysis which would be required as a <br /> result of Policy 10.0. <br /> POLICY 5.0 <br /> "The City will enhance the quality of all developed public land by planting and maintaining appropriate trees." <br /> Discussion: This was meant by the Tree Commission to cover both rights -of- way, parks, and land owned by the City for <br /> public buildings. They wished to insure that the Public Works Department would work to provide more trees in the City's <br /> parks as well as around public buildings and streets. Parks Planning will review the appropriate amount of trees in future <br /> park developments. Facilities Engineering should include trees where possible in the development or redevelopment of <br /> the site plans for public building construction. POLICY 7.0 "The City will adopt measures intended to ensure that new <br /> trees planted on public lands and along street rights -of- -way are of the highest quality, require low maintenance, and do <br /> not interfere with public safety." Discussion: There have been past practices considered poor by some people of making <br /> the planting budget go further through the purchasing of marginal quality stock (whips) and realizing a higher level of <br /> mortality would result. This policy requires staff to examine the quality of the stock purchased to insure it is above <br /> marginal standards. The Urban Forester will be available to work with anyone specifying the purchase of trees or <br /> inspecting the trees on their delivery to help insure compliance with this policy. POLICY 8.0 "The City will amend the <br /> Eugene Code to protect trees on public land and street rights -of -way from the potential adverse impacts of <br /> construction- related activities." Discussion: It was recommended for Engineering to add the requirement for a "tree <br /> protection plan" to be submitted from contractors working on City projects. We would provide a set of general guidelines <br /> and specifications which their plan should meet, then they would provide the specifics. Jan felt he had existing example <br /> standards from other documents which could be modified as a starting point. Jan will provide Engineering with a draft of <br /> these general guidelines and specifications within the next 60 days. We didn't discuss what was needed to be done <br /> about home construction contractors who use the right -of -way for materials storage. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.