New Search
Two additional specific needs were identified. First, the development of the <br /> Standard Operational Policies (S.O.P.) for Tree Operations. Second, the <br /> development of clear designations of authority between the various players. <br /> While time didn't allow extended discussions a follow -up meeting is scheduled <br /> for Monday March 15, 1993 from 8:00 to 10:00 in the small conference room. <br /> In anticipation of the March 15th meeting, Jan Staszewski agreed to immedi- <br /> ately supply copies of the S.O. P. outline he is currently working on. The <br /> group held a small brainstorming session to identify issues to think about <br /> over the next week and to be ready to discuss. <br /> 1. Need for the Standard Operations Policy <br /> a) Need a Timeline <br /> b) Need a development process description <br /> c) Need players identified for each phase of process in #b. above. <br /> 2. Need for increased Communications for "TEAM" Development <br /> a) Need to identify players <br /> b) Need to establish level of priority or commitment <br /> c) Possible means: <br /> 1. Scheduled regular meetings <br /> 2. Increased use of electronic mail (OA) <br /> 3. Urban Forester attend crew meetings <br /> 3. What is status of Tree Inventory <br /> 4. Tree Planting <br /> a) Who's responsible <br /> 1. On R/W <br /> 2. In Parks <br /> 3. Volunteer efforts in either <br /> 4. Coordination with other affected operational crews <br /> a. Irrigation <br /> b. Mowing <br /> 5. Operations Crews Coordination <br /> a) Smoother merged operations between Landscape and Tree Crews <br /> b) Understanding of roles between the Lead Workers and Supervisors <br /> 6. Need to develop a "CRIB SHEET" of standard answers to questions often <br /> asked by the public. <br /> 7. Need to schedule Brainstorming sessions for S.O.P <br /> a) With Tree Crew <br /> b) With Involved supervisory staff <br /> c) With other departments /divisions <br /> 1. Engineering <br /> 2. Transportation <br /> 3. Planning <br /> 4. Building <br /> 8. Do we wish to invite Lead Workers to the next meeting? <br />