08!10/88 MON 12:58 FAX 503 986 4786 ODA PLANT DIV, 0 002 0 >., Departm of Agriculture <br /> , e ': ,, O regon Mailing address: <br /> +" ; , -: 635 Capitol Street NE <br /> ".�: <br /> John A. KiFzheUeq M.A.. Governor Salem, OR 97310 -0110 <br /> Location address: <br /> August 10, 1998 3420 Cherry Ave NE <br /> Mil„ <br /> (i \ <br /> Mike Bellmore /Jeff Anderson <br /> Department of Urban Forestry <br /> Public Works Maintenance <br /> City of Eugene <br /> 1820 Roosevelt <br /> Eugene OR 97402 <br /> SUBJECT: Occurrence of Dutch Elm Disease in Eugene <br /> The occurrence of Dutch elm disease (DED) caused by the fungus, , Ophiostoma ulmi, <br /> (= Ceratocystis ulmi), in elm trees requires prompt attention when it is found to remove <br /> the infected trees. <br /> Since the 1986 outbreak of DED in Eugene and Portland, there have been annual <br /> surveys by cities such as Portland, Hillsboro, and Corvallis to identify infected trees, <br /> and they have promptly removed them to eliminate the source of inoculum for the elm <br /> bark beetle to carry to other trees. If the infected trees are not removed, <br /> they serve as <br /> a source of inoculum for additional spread into the urban forest. There is also the <br /> possibility of adjacent trees becoming infected by underground root grafts between <br /> trees. <br /> When the last outbreak of DED occurred in Eugene, the prompt action by the Eugene <br /> City Council was important. The passage of the resolution supporting the efforts of the <br /> Department of Public Works was critical to reduce any additional spread. The 12 -year <br /> gap before the next outbreak of DED is encouraging. <br /> The City of Portland has had an active DED survey program carried out by the <br /> Department of Urban Forestry e e slowing e the spread disease remove <br /> the infected elm trees has successful in <br /> The City of Corvallis and Benton County have also had an active program to remove <br /> individual or clusters of DED infected elms. They also feel this proactive approach has <br /> been the correct approach. <br />