New Search
Budget - Metro GI Page 1 of 1 <br /> WALCH Therese <br /> ' From: Hayes, Richard H NWP [ Richard .H.Hayes @nwp0l.usace.army.mil] <br /> Sent: Tuesday, March 02, 2004 5:51 PM <br /> To: Bluhm, Eric V NWP; 'Therese Walch'; 'Stephanie Schulz'; 'Ed Black' <br /> Subject: Budget - Metro GI <br /> Importance: High <br /> Eric, <br /> Here is about as final a budget as I can put together based on what we know as of today. Please model it around <br /> to fit our normal formats, etc for these sorts of things. I've tried to iron out its previous incongruities, and I think it's <br /> down to a couple very small things that may not matter. See what you think. <br /> The narrative pieces to the workplan are coming next, and I will hack out a schedule -chart that puts these tasks in <br /> the proper order /juxtaposition of performance and fitting the work efforts/priorities we describe in the narratives. <br /> «Workplan Budget Fy04 -05 v5 - combined 03.02.04.xls» <br /> Ed, Therese, Stephanie - <br /> You may wish to include additional in -kind time by study team members and staff for "regular" study activities <br /> (management, coordination with our USACE team members, plan and product review, etc). Let us know if you <br /> have a guess as to what that might be - it's going to be as much an estimate of what you think you can wedge out <br /> on their time (their plate), as much as assessing the study's needs for their services. We'll also plug in the <br /> othorphoto value from all three sponsors into JAA next week (see my previous message this afternoon). <br /> Stephanie, it would be important to plug some modicum of county staffing support into this - I've included a <br /> column for the county for this purpose; also in the expectation that we will find resources later on. <br /> Also Ed and Therese, please look over this document in general - I welcome any feedback before our exec F, <br /> meeting. Since you saw this a week ago, I have broken it out into more detail about how we'd forecast using your F <br /> large -lump contributions across many tasks/activities. I based this on my understanding of the work tasks and of <br /> your priorities, and especially where these program/FTE, contract scopes, and monies are coming from or are <br /> oriented towards in your own budgets and work programs. <br /> There are still cryptic notations in the two right -most columns for helping you navigate these diwies. I can <br /> embellish those, but then we run into the problem of the sheet getting too unwieldy (again). F, <br /> i <br /> I have not broken out the "GI line item" money from each city: the 100K per year from each (200K each city, 400K <br /> total). As we discussed, we'll use this money and our federal funds to fill in the funding gaps that were left over <br /> after I plugged your targeted assets into the most logical tasks/niches. As we talked about, he study team would <br /> work together to track how this money is allocated and used in specific line item tasks/activities. <br /> It may be worth giving your execs a prelim walk- through of this budget scenario prior to the meeting, so we aren't <br /> totally cold? I <br /> more soon, thx, Rick <br /> 4/6/04 <br />