New Search
> confirmed by Matott via phone today) At one point, Matott had an option <br /> to <br /> > buy the property (about 12 acres). This option was contingent on his <br /> > ability to obtain City approval for a modification to Phase 5 of the <br /> > previously approved PUD. As a result of formal requests by Matott, the <br /> City <br /> > determined that the previous PUD approval on Phase 5 has expired. Any <br /> > development of the property from here will require a new PUD application. <br /> > The PUD approval that expired involved construction of a medium - density <br /> > residential development to include approx. 162 units. Since this approval <br /> > has expired and a new PUD would be required, the maximum number of units we <br /> > can guess /estimate would be allowed on the site would be approx. 90 units <br /> > (the exact number is unknown since no new PUD application or approval has <br /> > been submitted). <br /> > Matott at one time talked with John Etter about giving a portion of the <br /> site <br /> > to the City for park land (about 1.3 acres). This area is steep and wooded <br /> > (may even have wetlands) and according to Matott, Etter did not think it <br /> > could be usuable as an active park site (ie, ballfields, etc) due to these <br /> > constraints. To the best of my knowledge, no formal work to acquire any <br /> > park land on this 12 acre site has been done. <br /> > Hope this helps! Jean Hahn, Planning Division <br /> -- Boundary (ID e35IJXfssNEd4Z4csE8Q1g)-- <br /> Page 5 <br />