New Search
My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
New Search
Council AIS
COE
>
PW
>
POS_PWM
>
Parks
>
General Parks Info
>
Council AIS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/3/2014 1:38:52 PM
Creation date
6/3/2014 1:36:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PW_Operating
PW_Document_Type_ Operating
Correspondence
PW_Division
Parks and Open Space
Identification_Number
July 23, 2008
Document_Number
River Road Parks District
External_View
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
The RRPRD currently expends $0.6 million for services and materials, however, <br />under total annexation the City would potentially realize some economies of scale for <br />RRPRD's costs of services and materials. Additionally, capital costs would be <br />financed as part of the City's larger capital budget and the City could realize some . <br />reduction in additional costs. To offset the increased cost, the City would be able to <br />reduce its current expenditures by $100,000, the amount it currently pays the Park <br />District. <br />CITY OF EUGENE EXPECTED REVENUES <br />The City's revenues would rise as it collected fees from programs at Emerald Park. <br />Currently, RRPRD charges generally lower fees than the City does for comparable <br />activities. <br />It is unclear if the City would increase fees from the rates charged by RRPRD. <br />Assuming that the City did not increase fees at Emerald Park, revenues would <br />remain steady at the current rate of $0.9 million annually. <br />COSTS TO PROPERTY OWNERS <br />Property owners of unincorporated properties would see their property taxes <br />increase to the levels that City property owners pay. See Chapter 3 for a detailed <br />discussion of property tax impacts. <br />HOW DIFFERENT GROUPS VIEW THE ISSUES <br />River Road Residents are very supportive of the River Road Parks and Recreation <br />District and very satisfied with the Emerald Park and Recreation Center. Yet the <br />feeling is that beyond this park, River Road, and especially Santa Clara, are under - <br />served by neighborhood parks. According to the River Road and Santa Clara Urban <br />Services Committee Final Report, Awbrey Park is in need of renovations and the <br />other undeveloped sites lack the funding for development ._ <br />Some residents think that the City and the RRPRD should work toward a renewed <br />contract that ensures the long -term stability of the RRPRD. Some residents of Santa <br />Clara would also like to explore incorporating Santa Clara into the RRPRD. The <br />River Road and Santa Clara Urban Services Committee believes that the added <br />revenue would greatly improve recreation in the area. The River Road and Santa <br />Clara Urban Services Committee called building a community center for Santa Clara <br />the most critical of recreation needs in the area. <br />RRPRD is proud of its facilities and offerings and wants to preserve them for the <br />residents of the area. The RRPRD is concerned about its tax base and sustainability. <br />RRPRD has no plans to expand into Santa Clara. <br />u River Road and Santa Clan Urban Services Committee, Fix d Report and Reu mmexd4tiont, Sept 2002, p. 36. <br />Page 7 -18 ECONorthwest October 2004 RR/SC Fiscal Analysis: Parks <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.