New Search
My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
New Search
1998 Final Report Parks Survey
COE
>
PW
>
POS_PWM
>
Parks
>
General Parks Info
>
1998 Final Report Parks Survey
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2014 10:51:05 AM
Creation date
5/29/2014 2:04:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PW_Operating
PW_Document_Type_ Operating
Correspondence
PW_Division
Parks and Open Space
Identification_Number
January 1998
Document_Number
Eugene Survey Final Report
External_View
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
73
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
31 <br />Eugene Survey <br />On Athletic Fields, Open Spaces, and Parks <br />January, 1998 <br />Additional Research Options <br />INTRODUCTORY COMMENTS <br />There are two possible methods for further research: focus groups and surveys. <br />FOCUS GROUPS <br />Focus groups should examine qualitative aspects of opinions held by identifiable segments of the <br />overall population. Typically, this means examining the opinions held by groups which are either <br />undecided or likely to change their opinion in contrast to those groups which are favorable. <br />There are several possible demographic makeups for possible focus groups: <br />1. west Eugeneans who are under 50 or who have children could be asked about reasons for <br />support or opposition; and <br />2. those who live more than one mile from a park could be asked about park usage habits. <br />Other groups could be constructed to respond to more specific requests for information. <br />SURVEY RESEARCH <br />This survey examined support for athletic facilities, open spaces, and parks issues without <br />specifying the form of tax, prior to a large -scale effort to inform Eugeneans about these issues, <br />and prior to the formulation of specific proposals which could be placed before voters. <br />Specific tax issues were not covered in this survey instrument because of their varied nature, the <br />significant increase in length of this survey necessary in order to gather meaningful responses, <br />and the possible bias which could be induced by mixing topics in one survey instrument. <br />Obviously, the particular form of tax could have an effect on ballot support. <br />The survey was done at this stage in the process in order to ascertain a baseline level of support <br />and opposition for these issues. Later surveys could be undertaken in order to gauge changes in <br />support and /or to provide measures of support for a specific proposal or set of proposals. <br />Given this, there are several possible extensions which could elaborate on and /or remedy these <br />limitations of this particular research study. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.