New Search
' <br />19 <br />Comparison Table <br />Ballot Measure Component Questions Ranked by <br />Net Support <br />Question <br />Total Spt. <br />DK <br />Total Qup. <br />Net Spt. <br />2d. Maintain existing parks? <br />92% <br />3% <br />5% <br />87% <br />2a. Neighborhood parks? <br />69% <br />8% <br />24% <br />45% <br />2c. Buying land for parks? <br />68% <br />9% <br />23% <br />45% <br />2e. Operating new parks? <br />65% <br />13% <br />22% <br />43% <br />2b. Community parks? <br />61% <br />12% <br />26% <br />35% <br />3d. New fields? <br />60% <br />12% <br />29% <br />31% <br />3a. Replace Amazon? <br />55% <br />16% <br />30% <br />25% <br />3b. Aquatics center? <br />55% <br />13% <br />33% <br />22% <br />4a. Ridgeline trail? <br />52% <br />13% <br />35% <br />17% <br />4b. Wetland areas <br />48% <br />9% <br />43% <br />5% <br />3c. New gyms? <br />43% <br />13% <br />45% <br />-2% <br />The range of net support for individual components is extremely wide. Extraordinarily strong <br />support is given to maintaining existing parks. The remainder of the parks proposals and the new <br />athletic fields proposals all receive good support. The two swimming center proposals, replacing <br />Amazon and the new Aquatic Center receive a lower level of support. The two open spaces <br />components and the new gyms component receive insufficient support to have a reasonable <br />chance to pass at the ballot box without the public receiving significant new information. <br />