New Search
My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
New Search
1998 Eugene Parks Survey
COE
>
PW
>
POS_PWM
>
Parks
>
General Parks Info
>
1998 Eugene Parks Survey
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2014 10:51:05 AM
Creation date
5/29/2014 2:01:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
PW_Operating
PW_Document_Type_ Operating
Correspondence
PW_Division
Parks and Open Space
Identification_Number
January 1998
Document_Number
Athletic Fields, Open Space
External_View
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Eugene Survey <br />On Athletic Fields, Open Spaces, and Parks <br />January, 1998 <br />Introduction <br />PURPOSE: <br />The purpose of the research is to learn the attitudes of Eugene voters regarding a possible ballot <br />measure to maintain and expand Eugene's parks, build new athletic fields, gyms, and swimming <br />pools, and purchase more open spaces. <br />METHODOLOGY: <br />A total of 400 interviews of likely Eugene general election voters were completed. The sample <br />was selected and quotas were established to guarantee a statistically accurate representation of <br />the likely voting population in a November, 1998 election. <br />The survey has an error margin of approximately 5 %. <br />Telephone interviews were conducted between January 19 and 23, 1998 by interviewers hired <br />and administered by Advanced Marketing Research of Eugene, Oregon. The response rate was <br />69 %. <br />NOTES ON INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS <br />More complete analyses will be provided later, but several guidelines should be noted with these <br />preliminary results. <br />First, this survey is simply a snapshot of options at a point in time. Over time, as people acquire <br />more information, opinions will change and is the only guarantee. <br />Second, the sample simulates participants in a typical November General election. <br />Third, based on other, similar surveys, voters who are undecided about money measures are <br />much more likely to vote no than yes when the question appears on the ballot. It is safest to <br />interpret undecided voters as likely no voters. In practice, some of the yes voters probably will <br />also vote no when the time to vote arrives. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.